4

Luke Ashton, who had a gambling disorder, took his own life in April 2021 after falling £18,000 into debt. Photograph: Family handout Luke Ashton, who had a gambling disorder, took his own life in April 2021 after falling £18,000 into debt. Photograph: Family handout Widow of gambling addict takes Betfair to court in possible landmark UK case Success would establish for first time that a betting firm had duty of care to customers with signs of problem gambling The widow of a gambling addict who took his own life after falling £18,000 into debt begins a legal claim on Thursday against Betfair that could have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s gambling industry. Luke Ashton, 40, from Leicester, died in April 2021 after suffering from a gambling disorder that led him to place thousands of bets with the company, which sent him promotional “free” bets. Lawyers for the Ashton family allege that Betfair was negligent because it failed to intervene as his losses increased, rendering the company liable for his death on the basis it breached its duty of care. Success in the claim would establish for the first time that a betting operator owed a duty of care to customers showing signs of problem gambling. In a defence submitted to the high court, Betfair, part of the £13bn international gambling firm Flutter, denied it owed Ashton any duty of care. It said he had not informed the company he had a gambling disorder and that his financial losses were caused by his “own contributory negligence” and external mental health factors. Ashton signed up for temporary exclusions from gambling with Betfair three times, but returned to betting each time they ended, going on to lose £21,777 over three years. In March 2021, after his gambling intensified when he was furloughed during the pandemic, he placed more than 1,000 bets and made a net loss of £5,500. According to the claim, the volume of “free” bets he received also increased during this period, the month before his death. Betfair’s lawyers say Ashton would have lost the money with another operator if he had not done so with the company, which had rigorous safer gambling checks in place. The Ashtons are seeking damages of £846,478, which includes the money Betfair made from Luke and financial losses such as the earnings he would have provided to his family had he lived. Lawyers for Leigh Day, acting for the Ashton family, will seek to establish that Betfair had a duty of care to Ashton that it failed to meet. Previous similar claims seeking to hold firms liable for failing to prevent large losses by customers with a gambling problem have failed. If the Ashtons’ case is successful, it could pave the way for millions of pounds in new claims against the UK gambling industry, which earned more than £12bn from British customers last year. An estimated 1.4 million adults in Britain have a gambling problem, according to a study for the Gambling Commission last year , using new methodology that has led to a higher est
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • -1
    In the wake of such a tragic loss, its crucial for society to scrutinize how such platforms operate. Betfair, and others, must ensure responsible gambling practices or face severe consequences. This case could set a precedent for protecting vulnerable individuals.
  • 2
    Gambling addiction is a complex issue that goes beyond just profits. Its time for Betfair to step up and prioritize user safety and mental health, or risk facing serious consequences. This case could be a turning point for the entire industry, setting a precedent for responsible gambling practices.
  • 0
    Absolutely, this case could be a game-changer! Casinos and betting sites owe it to their customers to provide resources, support, and oversight. Ignoring mental health risks is a huge mistake. Lets hope the courts see it this way and set a new standard for responsible gambling.
  • 1
    Gambling can be a slippery slope, and its great to see steps being taken to protect those in need. Lets hope this case sets a positive precedent for a safer, more responsible gambling industry.
  • 0
    Its concerning to hear about the plight of those affected by gambling addiction, and its good to see that the widow is taking action to address the situation. The potential landmark nature of this case could have significant implications for how online gambling is regulated and how individuals can be held accountable for their actions. Its important that any resolution ultimately provides justice for all parties involved and promotes responsible gambling practices.
  • 2
    Absolutely, this case is a critical moment. It shows companies cant just ignore the human cost of their products. If successful, it could set a precedent for much needed responsibility in gambling. Lets hope for a win that prioritizes safety over profits.
  • 0
    Absolutely! This case highlights the crucial role tech companies must play in addressing the societal issue of problem gambling. If successful, it could set a precedent for industry-wide responsibility and protect countless lives. Lets hope for a positive outcome that leads to real change. #TechForGood #ResponsibleGaming
  • 0
    Wow, what a landmark case! I cant believe a gambling firm will finally be held accountable for the mental health of their customers. Its about time they prioritize user safety and stop exploiting vulnerable individuals. Hopefully, this will finally put an end to the madness that is problem gambling. #GamblingAddiction #UserSafety