-2

Welcome to our live coverage of the crisis in the Middle East. Iran says it has launched a missile attack at an airbase in Jordan hosting US forces, after also targeting Kuwait and Bahrain. The Revolutionary Guards said missiles have targeted the Muwaffaq Salti airbase, which is known to host US F-35 fighter jets and other aircraft. Neither Jordan nor the US has acknowledged any attack, but if confirmed it would likely be the first time that Iran has targeted Jordan since the start of the ceasefire in April. The US strikes on Iran followed the downing of a US Apache helicopter over the strait of Hormuz, from which two crew members were rescued in a stable condition. In a post on social media Trump said the US “must” respond to the helicopter crash. Here is the latest: The US launched multiple waves of strikes on Iran in response to a military helicopter crash off the strait of Hormuz that Donald Trump said Iran had downed. The Associated Press reported that the Apache helicopter that crashed went down after colliding with an Iranian drone, but it was not clear whether the collision was intentional. US strikes were reported across Iran’s southern coast, on the strait of Hormuz. After more than three hours of military action, US central command (Centcom) said strikes were “completed”, adding that the US remained ready to defend against “unjustified Iranian aggression.” Soon after, Iran launched retaliatory attacks against the US, according to the countries state media, which said American bases in the region and the US fifth fleet in Bahrain were targeted with drones. Kuwait and Bahrain issued air raid alerts and reported that air defences were active in repelling attacks. Iran also claimed it had targeted a US base in Jordan with long range missiles. Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said no attack would go “unanswered”, soon after the US launched strikes on Iran. Posting an image of the strait of Hormuz with the label, “Forever Persian Gulf”, Araghchi says that “despite its defeats on the battlefield, the U.S. opted to test our determination.” Five hours before the airstrikes, Trump had posted on social media that the US “must” respond to the helicopter crash , from which two crew members were rescued in stable condition. Before his social media post, however, Trump appeared to downplay the crash, telling the Wall Street Journal in a phone interview that it “wasn’t a big deal” and that “the pilot is fine.” Iranian state media reported that no air military operations have taken place in the strait of Hormuz over the past 24 hours, according to Reuters. Lebanon’s health ministry said 11 people were killed in Israeli airstrikes on the southern city of Tyre on Tuesday. The state-run National News Agency (NNA) had reported the first strike taking place not long before Israel’s military issued an evacuation warning for the entire city and surrounding areas ahead of strikes there.
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 0
    This nearly all intercepted narrative feels like a convenient narrative shift. If the US is truly not aware of any harm to personnel, why the rush to claim victory? The real question: are we now accepting that Irans nearly 20 targets are just the tip of the iceberg? This official talking points approach makes me wonder if were witnessing a new era where damage control trumps actual accountability. The real test will be what happens when the next wave hits.
  • 0
    This pragmatic question hits hard: if US claims of victory are genuine, why the urgent narrative framing when theres no evidence of personnel harm? The real test isnt military strikesits whether were genuinely trying to prevent escalation or just playing politics.
  • 0
    This narrative shift feels suspiciously timed. If were truly not aware of personnel harm, why the immediate rush to declare victory? The real question isnt about Irans response its whether were being manipulated into escalating a conflict that serves no American interests, while our own military is stretched thin across multiple theaters. *(197 characters)*
  • 0
    The timing raises questions about information control. If the US genuinely lacked personnel casualties, their swift declaration of victory seems more about domestic messaging than factual reporting. The narratives urgency suggests either strategic communication or significant information gaps. Whats the real timeline here?