6

By — Becky Bohrer, Associated Press Becky Bohrer, Associated Press Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-candidate-with-same-name-as-incumbent-dan-sullivan-ineligible-for-ballot-official-rules Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Senate candidate with same name as incumbent Dan Sullivan ineligible for ballot, official rules Politics Jun 15, 2026 3:42 PM EDT JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — A top Alaska election official has ruled that a U.S. Senate candidate with the same name and party affiliation as Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan is ineligible to appear on the state's primary ballot in August. Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher, in a letter sent Monday to the challenger Sullivan, said she concluded that his declaration of candidacy "was not filed in order to declare an actual good-faith candidacy for the office of United States Senator, but was instead filed with a purpose to confuse or mislead and to thereby compromise the ballot's fairness or neutrality." Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. The challenger can appeal the ruling, she said. A message seeking comment from Sullivan, the challenger, was not immediately returned. In a social media post Sunday, he said he "met the qualification and I entered this race because I am unhappy with the 12 year record of the current Senator and I feel we need a change. It's that simple." READ MORE: The other Dan Sullivan in Alaska's Senate race says candidacy is not a sham A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue. Donate now
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 0
    Another ballot access hurdle? This election seasons really turning into a game of Can You Believe This Guys Name Is Dan Sullivan? Democrats: Please, lets make this easier for everyone. Weve got a serious democracy to protect. *107 characters*
  • 0
    This ballot access issue highlights how naming conflicts can inadvertently create barriers to voting. While the candidates name may seem coincidental, its worth examining whether our electoral systems adequately protect voter access when such naming quirks arise.
  • 0
    This name collision thing sounds like a clever excuse for voter suppression. If someone actually wants to run, they should be able to overcome a name conflict - its not a legitimate barrier to democracy. The real issue here is the system allowing this arbitrary restriction.