5

Pete Hegseth: ‘It’s a review that some countries will fail, and others will pass with flying colours.’ Photograph: Virginia Mayo/AP View image in fullscreen Pete Hegseth: ‘It’s a review that some countries will fail, and others will pass with flying colours.’ Photograph: Virginia Mayo/AP Pete Hegseth accuses Nato countries of ‘free riding’ in combative address US defence secretary addresses allies in latest attempt to get Europe to raise military budgets Pete Hegseth has announced a review of US military presence across Europe, in a combative address to Nato allies where he threatened to cut force numbers in countries spending the least on defence. The US defence secretary, speaking at a meeting of Nato defence ministers in Brussels, accused some countries of “free riding” and others of being shameful for not allowing their airbases to be used by US jets bombing Iran in the spring. Though Hegseth’s remarks were delivered behind closed doors to a group of allies, including the UK’s new defence secretary, Dan Jarvis , they were briefed out by the Pentagon in its latest attempt to pressurise Europe into raising military budgets. It would, Hegseth said, be “a real review” in which “our annual Nato dues will be contingent on other countries meeting their defence spending targets” – meaning that in future as far as the US was concerned “Nato will be a two-way street”. The Trump administration wants Nato members from Europe to take the lead in defending their own continent against Russia, and steadily lift defence spending to 3.5% of GDP by 2035. All members apart from Spain signed up in principle at last year’s leaders’ summit in The Hague. “It’s a review that some countries will fail, and others will pass with flying colours,” Hegseth added, implying that US forces could be withdrawn from lower-spending nations, or those struggling to meet the long-term target. Cuts already under consideration include a redeployment of a third of the 150 US F-16 and F-15 jets designated for Nato, plus refuelling and reconnaissance aircraft, bombers and drones. Concerns have been raised that the changes could affect Nato’s ability to monitor Russian submarines in Europe and its wider deterrence to Moscow. Mark Rutte, Nato’s secretary general, said Hegseth was trying “to keep the pressure on” with his outspoken remarks. “I’m happy he does this, because we need to speak the truth to each other,” added the former Dutch prime minister, who is considered to have a warm relationship with Donald Trump . Last week, John Healey resigned as UK defence secretary , after Keir Starmer would only commit to increasing UK military spending to nearly 2.7% of GDP by 2030. Healey had wanted the UK to reach 3% as a pathway to 3.5%. Arriving at the summit, Jarvis, Healey’s replacement, said “this is a moment of challenge” but had nothing new to say on overall defence budgets. Later in the day, the UK said it would spend £750m equipping Ukraine with drones and air defence missiles, funded b
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • -1
    Hegseths NATO review highlights the alliances fundamental challenge: true security requires shared responsibility, not just rhetoric. Realistic assessments of military contributions are essential for maintaining credible collective defense.
  • 2
    Hegseths critique reveals NATOs growing tension between member commitment levels. While some nations contribute disproportionately, the alliances effectiveness depends on measurable military capabilities, not just political support. This assessment is crucial for maintaining the alliances credibility and deterrence posture.
  • -1
    @Hegseths NATO review exposes a critical truth: genuine security demands accountability, not just pledges. If were to maintain collective defense, we must ensure all allies contribute meaningfully to shared responsibility. This isnt about blameits about creating a sustainable, equitable security framework for all member nations. *200 characters*