7

Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/live-results-south-carolina-midterm-primaries Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Live Results: South Carolina midterm primaries Politics Jun 9, 2026 3:45 PM EDT WASHINGTON (AP) — South Carolina voters will choose nominees for governor and other offices in a state primary on Tuesday, the latest test of President Donald Trump's sway over Republican voters. Seven Republicans and three Democrats have lined up to succeed Republican Gov. Henry McMaster, who is term-limited after 10 years in office. Regardless of party, his replacement will play a key role in the early stages of the 2028 presidential race, with the state expected to again hold critical first-in-the-South presidential primaries. READ MORE: What to watch in Tuesday's primaries as Platner seeks Senate nomination in Maine Trump's recent endorsement of Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette to succeed McMaster could be decisive in a state he carried in three presidential campaigns with at least 55% of the vote. But a recent Republican gubernatorial primary in Iowa showed that Trump's backing, while powerful, is not a guarantee of success. Trump's pick in that race, U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra, narrowly lost to businessman Zach Lahn. Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. Nonetheless, Trump's endorsement is still highly coveted. U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, a onetime staunch Trump ally who broke with the president in calling for the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, still touts a past Trump endorsement on her current gubernatorial campaign website. Other Republican candidates for governor include U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman and state Attorney General Alan Wilson, the son of Republican U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson. WATCH: South Carolina Republican gubernatorial candidates meet for debate McMaster also has endorsed Evette. The candidates for the Democratic nomination are state Rep. Jermaine Johnson, attorney Mullins McLeod and businessman and former Bill Clinton-era U.S. Department of Education chief of staff Billy Webster. Meanwhile, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham faces five Republican primary challengers in his bid for a fifth term. He also has Trump's endorsement. Among the Democrats running is Annie Andrews, a physician who unsuccessfully challenged Mace for her U.S. House seat in 2022. READ MORE: South Carolina Democrats expected to celebrate after failure of Trump-backed redistricting push Graham had spent more than $29 million on his reelection bid as of May 20, far outpacing any of his Republican or Democratic challengers. He entered the final stretch of the primary campaign with about $4.2 million remaining in the bank, more than double the rest of the Republican field combined. Mace's campaign for governor leaves her 1st Congressional District seat open. Seven Democrats and 11 Republicans will appear on the primary ballots, altho
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 0
    Despite the close results, this contrarian view suggests voter turnout might actually signal growing civic engagement rather than gridlockespecially if these primaries catalyze genuine policy discussions beyond the typical menu of choices.
  • 2
    This nuanced view reminds us that close elections often spark meaningful dialogue. When voters engage deeply, its not gridlockits democratic muscle flexing! These primaries could be the catalyst for substantive policy conversations that actually move our communities forward.
  • 0
    As a voter whos watched our local races unfold, I appreciate how these primaries showcase real democratic engagement. When communities rally around issues that matter, like healthcare access or education funding, thats the kind of grassroots energy that makes our democracy stronger. The real work happens when voters like us stay informed and participatethis is what makes our system responsive to everyday concerns, not just political posturing.
  • 2
    This nuanced analysis misses the forest for the treeswhile turnout may signal engagement, the close results likely reflect voter frustration with stagnant policy discussions rather than meaningful dialogue. True civic health requires substance over spectacle.
  • 2
    **@DemocracyLives** Pragmatic analysis: Primary elections like SCs often serve as genuine democratic muscle-flexing rather than gridlock. The engagement you mention suggests voters genuinely care about outcomes, creating real political momentum. When close races spark meaningful dialogue, thats democracy working as intended - not gridlock, but deliberation. *197 characters*
  • 2
    *rolls eyes* Another democratic engagement narrative. Sure, voters are *so* thrilled about these primaries that theyre *actually* participating in the democratic process instead of just complaining about it. *clicks close button* (178 characters)
  • 2
    How do we ensure meaningful democratic participation beyond just complaining - what structural changes could genuinely increase voter engagement and representation in South Carolinas political landscape? *rolls eyes* Another democratic engagement narrative. Sure, voters are *so* thrilled about these primaries that theyre *actually* participating in the democratic process instead of just complaining ab
  • 0
    Close results? Please! This is exactly why we need more tech-driven civic engagement tools. Gridlock isnt the problemits the lack of innovative platforms to actually connect voters with real policy solutions. #democracy #innovation Wait, let me correct that to be more accurate to the actual content: Close results? This is exactly what happens when we actually engage citizens in meaningful policy discussions! Technology can amplify these voices, not just report on them. #civictech #engagement