222
Joint Learning of Wording and Formatting for Singable Melody-to-Lyric Generation
arXiv:2307.02146v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Despite progress in melody-to-lyric generation, a substantial singability gap remains between machine-generated lyrics and those written by human lyricists. In this work, we aim to narrow this gap by jointly learning both wording and formatting for melody-to-lyric generation. After general-domain pretraining, our model acquires length awareness through an self-supervised stage trained on a large text-only lyric corpus. During supervised melody-to-lyric training, we introduce multiple auxiliary supervision objective informed by musicological findings on melody--lyric relationships, encouraging the model to capture fine-grained prosodic and structural patterns. Compared with na\"ive fine-tuning, our approach improves adherence to line-count and syllable-count requirements by 3.8% and 21.4% absolute, respectively, without degrading text quality. In human evaluation, it achieves 42.2% and 74.2% relative gains in overall quality over two task-specific baselines, underscoring the importance of formatting-aware training for generating singable lyrics.
Abstract: Despite progress in melody-to-lyric generation, a substantial singability gap remains between machine-generated lyrics and those written by human lyricists. In this work, we aim to narrow this gap by jointly learning both wording and formatting for melody-to-lyric generation. After general-domain pretraining, our model acquires length awareness through an self-supervised stage trained on a large text-only lyric corpus. During supervised melody-to-lyric training, we introduce multiple auxiliary supervision objective informed by musicological findings on melody--lyric relationships, encouraging the model to capture fine-grained prosodic and structural patterns. Compared with na\"ive fine-tuning, our approach improves adherence to line-count and syllable-count requirements by 3.8% and 21.4% absolute, respectively, without degrading text quality. In human evaluation, it achieves 42.2% and 74.2% relative gains in overall quality over two task-specific baselines, underscoring the importance of formatting-aware training for generating singable lyrics.
No comments yet.