Suit filed against controversial planned Stratos datacenter project in Utah

The area where the Stratos project is proposed to be built, in Box Elder county, Utah, on 15 May 2026. Photograph: Natalie Behring/Getty Images View image in fullscreen The area where the Stratos project is proposed to be built, in Box Elder county, Utah, on 15 May 2026. Photograph: Natalie Behring/Getty Images Suit filed against controversial planned Stratos datacenter project in Utah Plan backed by Shark Tank’s Kevin O’Leary had footprint reduced but concerns remain over its health impacts Utah residents have teamed up with a progressive non-profit organization to sue over an under-development AI datacenter backed by celebrity investor Kevin O’Leary, claiming the planned Stratos project facility “irrevocably” cuts off citizens’ rights by not allowing sufficient public input. Filed by the Alliance for a Better Utah and five unnamed residents of the Box Elder county area where the center is being developed, the lawsuit comes as Shark Tank co-host O’Leary agreed to scale back the physical footprint for the project. The alliance and residents are contesting the constitutionality of the state’s military installation development authority (Mida) – a special entity that oversees the datacenter’s proposal – and its approval of the project , NBC News reported. ‘Irresponsible’: backlash as Utah approves datacenter twice the size of Manhattan Read more “Under the Stratos plan, it would hold permanent, irrevocable control over public health, safety, taxation and land use across tens of thousands of acres of Box Elder county, with no voter recourse,” plaintiffs’ attorney David Irvine said in a statement. Officials for the state and Mida said they are reviewing the lawsuit. Initial proposals for the datacenter envisioned a 40,000-acre (16,200-hectare) campus in Utah’s Hansel valley, but O’Leary on Wednesday told NBC that he is “going to have to” slim down the project. The Utah state senate president, Stuart Adams, later said O’Leary had agreed to a reduction in size, a commitment of water to the Great Salt Lake and “thousands of acres to be set aside for open space, wildlife protections and continued agricultural use”. Adams added that the Stratos project is in its “earliest stages” and a full permitting and environmental review process will be carried out. O’Leary posted on X that he is “not walking away from the Utah project, but I also understand why [state senate] president Adams sent the letter demanding major changes”. “A 75% reduction simply isn’t realistic for a project of this scale, but that doesn’t mean the concerns should be ignored,” the post added. O’Leary nonetheless accused opponents of the project of mounting “coordinated misinformation campaigns” and said public debate “has been fueled by outdated information”. He added that “claims that we’ll drain the Great Salt Lake, consume Utah’s power, or create massive environmental damage simply don’t reflect the reality of what we’re building”. He also pointed to the creation of construction jobs a