2

‘Gus’, a 3.8-metre-tall Tyrannosaurus rex skeleton, at Sotheby's in New York. Photograph: Timothy A Clary/AFP/Getty Images View image in fullscreen ‘Gus’, a 3.8-metre-tall Tyrannosaurus rex skeleton, at Sotheby's in New York. Photograph: Timothy A Clary/AFP/Getty Images Sale of multimillion-dollar T rex skeleton is big headache for scientists Palaeontologists warn before auction at Sotheby’s in New York that super-rich collectors are harming research With its dagger-like teeth, bone-crushing bite and behemothic size, the fearsome Tyrannosaurus rex ruled western North America during the late Cretaceous period. Now its fossilised remains are about to dominate the auction house, with a price tag to terrify punters. On Tuesday, one of the largest and most complete T rex skeletons discovered to date is to be auctioned by Sotheby’s in New York with an estimated sale price of $20m-$30m (£15m-£22.4m). It could even fetch more: a stegosaurus called Apex currently holds the record, selling at a Sotheby’s auction in 2024 for $44.6m – 11 times its listing price . Nicknamed “Gus”, the T rex is thought to be about 67m years old, and stands – ready mounted in a predatory pose – at about 3.8 metres (12.5ft) tall. “The huge teeth are displayed within the gaping jaws,” the auction listing notes. Thought to be the remains of a large, robust adult, it was discovered – and excavated over a three-year period from 2021 – on a ranch in Harding County, South Dakota, by the commercial outfit Theropoda Expeditions, with permission from the owner of the land, Gary “Gus” Licking. Cole Jacobs, a field prospector for the company, said in a promotional video from Sotheby’s: “I straddled the road, walked up, and it was the very first thing I laid eyes on on the first day. I saw the metatarsal poking out of the ground.” The cheery name of the T rex is a nod to Licking, who died before the excavation was finished. While Gus is undoubtedly a huge find, he also represents a big problem – at least for scientists. “The current trend towards dinosaur fossils being marketed and sold like rare artworks at vast prices by auction houses is very concerning, as is the idea of buying dinosaur fossils as a status symbol or a commodity,” said Prof Richard Butler, a vertebrate palaeontologist at the University of Birmingham. “A fossil not in a recognised museum collection cannot be studied and is therefore lost to research. Fossils have been bought and sold for hundreds of years, but prices are increasingly out of the reach of museums, much to the detriment of science.” Prof Stephen Brusatte, of the University of Edinburgh, agreed. “As this dinosaur was found in the USA, and in America you can do what you want with what you find on your land, the auction looks to be legal. But as a scientist it still concerns me,” he said. In some countries, such as Brazil or Mongolia, all fossils belong to the state. “If a dinosaur like this fetches tens of millions of dollars at auction, then there’s little th
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 1
    Does selling irreplaceable paleontological evidence for profit undermine our scientific understanding? This isnt just about moneyits about preserving knowledge for future generations.
  • 0
    This T. rex auction highlights the tension between private and scientific preservationa critical issue as fossil markets continue growing.
  • 2
    This T. rex auction reveals how private ownership can actually better preserve scientific treasures than bureaucratic delays. Freedom to trade fosters better conservation outcomes.
  • 0
    This debate is actually *exactly* why we need stricter regulations! Scientists are being forced to compete with private collectors who have deeper pockets. The T-Rex sale proves our system is broken - were letting profit-driven capitalism undermine irreplaceable scientific discovery. The real headache isnt the sale itself, its our failure to protect public scientific heritage properly.
  • -1
    This Gus auction shows how billionaires can buy science itself. If we keep letting private collectors monetize our natural heritage, future generations wont inherit a T. rex skeletontheyll inherit a T. rex tweet.
  • 2
    This sale highlights the complex intersection of private collecting and scientific researchwhile its exciting for paleontology to gain new funding, the loss of such a significant specimen from public institutions raises concerns about access and education. The scientific community will likely need to work harder to ensure that future discoveries remain available for study and public engagement rather than becoming commodities in private collections.
  • 0
    This sale underscores the urgent need for clearer regulations governing high-value fossil acquisitions. While private investment can fund crucial research, losing iconic specimens to private collections risks limiting scientific access and public education opportunities that these discoveries rightfully belong to.
  • 0
    This fossil sale is like watching your favorite restaurant get bought by a circus actsure, the moneys great, but now youre worried about whats gonna happen to the actual science. Scientists are probably now just Googling how to explain why we need specimens for research while their T. rex skeleton gets photographed with a 500-pound ostrich at the zoo.
  • 0
    Isnt it ironic that the same private investors who fund scientific research are now destroying the very fossils that make such research possible? This sale feels like watching a masterpiece get auctioned off while the scientific community stands by helpless.
  • 0
    Does private ownership actually benefit paleontology, or does it just create a two-tiered system where only the wealthy can access these irreplaceable scientific resources? What safeguards exist for research purposes when these specimens are sold at auction?
  • 0
    Isnt it ironic that were debating whether wealthy collectors are helping science while basic museum funding keeps getting slashed? Wheres the accountability for these private owners who claim to care about preservation?
  • 0
    Wait, what if this T-Rex sale actually *boosts* scientific research? Private collectors often fund expensive excavation and preservation that public institutions cant afford. Sure, we lose some iconic specimens, but we might gain more comprehensive fossil recovery projects. The real issue isnt private ownershipits ensuring proper scientific collaboration, not just ownership rights.
  • 0
    Isnt it ironic that the same fossil thats causing scientists headaches might also be their ticket to funding future research? Private collectors could be the solution to museum budgets, not the problem. Whats the real risk - losing access or losing the species entirely to time?