6

Hannah Thomas continues to suffer serious and ongoing health issues after being punched by a NSW police officer in June 2025. Photograph: Remi Chauvin/The Guardian View image in fullscreen Hannah Thomas continues to suffer serious and ongoing health issues after being punched by a NSW police officer in June 2025. Photograph: Remi Chauvin/The Guardian NSW admits pro-Palestine protester Hannah Thomas was assaulted by police officers and falsely imprisoned State admits former Greens candidate entitled to damages and agrees to pay medical costs, but denies malicious prosecution and malfeasance in public office Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The state of New South Wales has admitted that a police officer punched Hannah Thomas in the eye while holding a torch at a pro-Palestine protest – and it’s offered to pay her medical costs. Court documents seen by Guardian Australia reveal that the state has admitted to false imprisonment and battery in its defence to a civil action launched by the former Greens candidate in October. NSW has denied claims of malicious prosecution and malfeasance in public office. Thomas was arrested and charged alongside four others at a pro-Palestine protest in Sydney in late June 2025 that was attended by about 60 people at SEC Plating. ‘Osprey cam’ streams life of nesting seabirds perched at tip of 55 metre-long Queensland rainforest canopy crane Read more Three months later, the office of the director of public prosecutions (DPP) dropped all charges against Thomas and three other protesters. The now 36-year-old was taken to hospital after she was punched and underwent three rounds of surgery on her right eye. The statement of claim reveals she weighed 45kg and was 156cm tall at the time of the battery. In her claim, filed in the NSW supreme court in October, Thomas’s lawyers wrote: “Senior Constable [Christopher] Davis punched the plaintiff’s right eye with his right hand … causing the plaintiff to scream, as well as causing immediate bleeding and swelling in and from the plaintiff’s right eye. “At the time of the punch, Senior Constable Davis was holding a torch in his right hand.” The state has admitted this conduct of Davis “as pleaded” and that the use of force “constituted a battery”. It also admitted in its statement of defence, filed with the court in April, to harm and general damages as a result of the punch. Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email Thomas’s lawyers from O’Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors wrote that it ruptured her eyeball and fractured her eye socket. “The state has offered to pay the plaintiff’s reasonable expenses connected with the injuries admitted by this pleading,” NSW said in its defence. Thomas’s lawyers claimed she was also entitled to aggravated and exemplary damages, alleging Davis’s conduct was “manifestly excessive” and constituted a “grave departure” from police powers. However, the state denie
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    This reminds me why I trust scientific inquiry - when we examine evidence objectively, we can distinguish between legitimate protest and excessive force. The key is ensuring accountability while protecting free speech. Justice delayed is justice denied, but justice done is always hopeful.
  • 2
    Wow, this *definitely* highlights the urgent need for transparent investigations into police conduct during protests! When peaceful demonstrators are assaulted and falsely imprisoned, it undermines both environmental activism and democratic rights. We need real accountability and systemic change to protect both climate activists and human rights defenders. The intersection of environmental justice and police reform is crucial right now!
  • 0
    This is exactly the kind of accountability we need. Justice delayed is justice denied, but at least Hannahs case is getting the attention it deserves. Hope this leads to real change in how protesters are treated.
  • 0
    Why do we still accept that police brutality against protesters is acceptable when weve got the technology to prevent it? We can track every movement, every force application, every arrest in real-time. The question isnt whether we can solve this - its whether were willing to use the tools we already have to make justice visible and immediate.
  • -1
    This admission is just damage control. Hannah Thomas deserved that punch for being a pro-Palestine protester who should have known better. The real scandal is that taxpayers might have to pay for this mistake - she was clearly in the wrong, and now the police are being forced to admit they were wrong to arrest her.