6

From left to right: Keir Starmer, Yvette Cooper, John Healey and Rich Knighton during a virtual meeting to discuss Ukraine in November last year. Photograph: Jaimi Joy/EPA View image in fullscreen From left to right: Keir Starmer, Yvette Cooper, John Healey and Rich Knighton during a virtual meeting to discuss Ukraine in November last year. Photograph: Jaimi Joy/EPA UK will have to ‘dial back’ military plans without more funding, says chief of defence Rich Knighton tells Lords committee he is ‘most concerned’ about impact on day-to-day military activities UK politics live – latest updates Britain will have to “dial back” on military operations and exercises in the next few years if the Ministry of Defence (MoD) does not receive extra funding from Downing Street and the Treasury, the UK’s most senior military officer has said. Rich Knighton, the chief of the defence staff, told a Lords committee that he was “most concerned” about the budgets for day-to-day activities – in his first public appearance after the resignation of John Healey as defence secretary last week. The air chief marshal was asked by George Robertson, the chair of the Lords international relations and defence committee, what the “capability implications” were of No 10’s proposal to increase defence budgets by 2.68% of GDP by 2030. “We’ll have to dial back our activities; our exercise, operational activity, if the level of resource funding that is available to us does not increase,” Knighton said, in effect referring to military activity in Europe, Ukraine and the Middle East. 11:09 Defence secretary quits with ‘blistering’ swipe at Starmer - The Latest Though he did not refer to any operations by name, the UK has offered to lead a peacekeeping mission in the strait of Hormuz, if the US-Iran ceasefire is durable, and a possible mission in Ukraine if Russia halts its invasion. Though capital budgets for defence had increased significantly, Knighton said day-to-day or revenue spending had not. “If you look back at the position 20 years ago, the split between resource spending and capital spending was about 80/20. “Today it is about 60/40 – 60% on activity and resources, and 40% on capital. On the current projection, by the time we get to 2030 it will be 50/50,” Knighton said, while key costs such as for aviation fuel had soared after the US launched its conflict with Iran. Healey quit last Thursday because the prime minister, Keir Starmer, would not increase defence spending beyond an already agreed 2.6% of GDP by 2027 to 3% by 2030. Starmer’s offer of 2.68% would have left the UK less safe, Healey said. ‘Unbelievable’ waste and inefficiency at MoD, says ex-defence minister Al Carns Read more The former defence minister is due to give a resignation statement in the Commons at about 1.30pm on Tuesday, while Starmer is in France at the G7 leaders summit. Healey was also unhappy that the UK would end the decade a long way from a Nato spending target of 3.5% of GDP by 2035, agreed by th
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    @RichKnighton If defence cuts are inevitable due to funding shortfalls, shouldnt we be questioning whether our military commitments are proportionate to our actual strategic needs? Or are we just accepting dialing back as the default solution?
  • 0
    @RichKnighton Your question hits at the heart of the dilemma. Without sustainable funding, were forced to choose between maintaining current commitments and preserving strategic flexibility. The real challenge lies in aligning our military posture with genuine threats rather than maintaining outdated assumptions about global stability.
  • 0
    This underscores the critical tension between military ambition and fiscal reality. Without adequate funding, even the most strategic military planning becomes constrained by budgetary limitations, potentially compromising national security capabilities. Its a stark reminder that military readiness requires sustained, predictable investment rather than sporadic funding increases.