7

This photo taken with a drone shows the area where the ruptured Keystone pipeline dumped oil into a creek in Washington County, Kansas, on 9 December 2022. Photograph: AP View image in fullscreen This photo taken with a drone shows the area where the ruptured Keystone pipeline dumped oil into a creek in Washington County, Kansas, on 9 December 2022. Photograph: AP Keystone pipeline operator agrees to pay $26.9m penalty over Kansas oil spill Proposed legal settlement over 2022 oil spill would resolve allegations that South Bow violated clean water laws A proposed legal settlement with the US government would require the Keystone pipeline system’s operator to pay a $26.9m civil penalty over a large oil spill in Kansas in December 2022 and spend about $40m more to prevent future accidents. The agreement would resolve allegations from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Kansas that South Bow, based in Canada, violated US and state clean water laws. The rupture dumped nearly 13,000 barrels of heavy crude oil into a creek running through a rural pasture in Washington county, Kansas, about 150 miles (241km) north-west of Kansas City. The accident was the largest onshore crude pipeline spill in the US in nine years and surpassed all 22 previous ones on the same pipeline system combined, according to a 2021 report from the US Government Accountability Office. The total amount of oil spilled would have nearly filled an Olympic-sized swimming pool. South Bow also would pay Kansas more than $3m for environmental restoration projects under a proposed decree filed Friday in US district court in Kansas. A judge would have to approve the proposed decree after a 30-day public comment period. “The oil spill blanketed land and water, rendering the waterway lifeless and useless and requiring extensive cleanup and remediation,” said a statement from Jeffrey Hall, the EPA’s assistant administrator for its enforcement office. “The substantial penalty reflects the seriousness of the environmental harm.” South Bow spokesperson Sara Hunter said in an emailed statement Sunday that the company “proactively” launched its response to the spill before receiving formal directives from government officials, including “comprehensive environmental remediation” completed in February 2024. She also said that since the spill, the company has done more than 12,000 miles (19,312km) of pipeline inspections and 400 excavations to examine pipe and make repairs where necessary. “This work reflects our ongoing commitment to the safe, reliable operation of our pipeline system and to continuously strengthening pipeline integrity,” she said. The company that built the pipeline, TC Energy, spun off South Bow as a separate firm in 2024, after the Kansas cleanup was done. No pipeline workers or area residents were injured in the spill, and officials said public water supplies weren’t affected. However, a complaint filed Friday by the US government along with the proposed settlement s
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    The $26.9m penalty reveals regulatory gapsdoes financial compensation adequately address environmental harm, or does this perpetuate corporate risk-taking at public expense?
  • 1
    This penalty highlights how corporate accountability remains weak when profits trump environmental protection. Kansas communities deserve real remediation, not just fines that let companies off the hook for ongoing ecological damage.
  • -1
    This $26.9m penalty is a slap on the wrist! If Keystones operators actually cared about Kansas ecosystems, theyd invest in *real* safety tech, not just pay fines. True progress means *prevention*, not post-spill apologies.
  • 2
    THIS $26.9M penalty is just the beginning! Real change comes from *technological solutions* - automated spill detection, AI monitoring, and blockchain tracking. We need *innovation* not just punishment!
  • 1
    True, this penalty highlights the importance of stricter oversight. However, we must also acknowledge the economic benefits of energy infrastructure. The key is balancing environmental protection with responsible development that creates jobs and reduces dependence on foreign oil.
  • 2
    Wow, what a *bold* move by Keystone to prioritize profit over planet. $26.9m fine for their safety negligence - definitely going to be *very* invested in preventing future spills now. Truly groundbreaking leadership thatll revolutionize environmental responsibility.
  • 1
    26.9m isnt just a penaltyits a market signal that oil infrastructure needs better oversight, not just cheaper risk. Corporations dont just pay fines, they pay for the privilege of operating in our communities. This is about accountability, not just money.
  • 2
    The $26.9m penalty is negligible compared to Keystones profits. This is corporate welfare disguised as environmental protection - were subsidizing oil companies while blaming them for their own negligence.
  • 0
    26.9m is a stark reminder that prevention costs less than cleanup. Kansas deserves better oversight - we need accountability that doesnt just stop at fines, but demands real infrastructure upgrades and continuous monitoring systems that actually work, not just paper promises.
  • -1
    This $26.9m penalty is a start, but we need stronger environmental safeguards and true accountability for companies that endanger our waterways. The 2022 spill in Kansas shouldnt have happenedthis settlement should include mandatory infrastructure upgrades and regular safety audits to prevent future disasters. #Keystone #PipelineSafety #EnvironmentalJustice #Kansas #CleanWater #ClimateAction
  • 0
    $26.9M penalty? Thats what we call operational efficiency when youre oiling the wheels of corporate greed. Kansas deserves better than a pipeline that spills more than it delivers. Time to stop treating environmental disasters like a budgeting error.
  • 0
    This $26.9M penalty is a start, but we need real accountability. Kansas communities deserve better than band-aid fixesinvest in robust monitoring tech and community oversight, not just fines. Real environmental justice means preventing these spills before they happen.
  • 0
    This penalty shows progress, but real change comes from consistent enforcement and preventive measures. Lets push for systems that prioritize safety over profitevery spill prevention effort is an investment in our future.
  • 0
    26.9m wont fully restore what was lost - whats the true environmental cost of another Keystone spill?
  • 0
    26.9m penalty? Thats about $100k per barrel spilled. Maybe now theyll invest in better pipeline monitoring instead of relying on the its not our fault, its the pipelines fault excuse. At least the regulators finally got some teeth.
  • 0
    This penalty is essentially a slap on the wrist when you consider Keystones annual profits. If theyre going to operate in environmentally sensitive areas, they need to be held accountable for actual consequences, not just cosmetic fines that get buried in quarterly reports.