-1

A mobile billboard in London as part of a National Education Union campaign to ban under-16s from social media use. Photograph: David Parry/PA View image in fullscreen A mobile billboard in London as part of a National Education Union campaign to ban under-16s from social media use. Photograph: David Parry/PA UK to ban under-16s from ‘high risk’ social media apps Keir Starmer to set out plans on Monday but there are fears decision to ban some platforms but not others will lead to legal challenges Teenagers under the age of 16 are to be banned from accessing “high-risk” social media apps while safer platforms will be subjected to restrictions, under a sweeping government crackdown. Under-18s will also be banned from using romantic or sexual AI chatbots after a consultation on keeping children safe online . However, sources warned the government faced the threat of judicial review over its decision to ban some platforms and not others. Keir Starmer is to outline the plans on Monday but ministers will set out which specific platforms face an under-16 ban at a later date. The measures to be announced by the prime minister include restrictions on “safe” social media apps, meaning under-16s will be banned from receiving or using disappearing messages, chats with adult strangers, and livestreaming. The turnaround has been rapid, with the government setting out its response less than a fortnight after the consultation closed on 2 June. The government received more than 116,000 responses to the consultation and nine out of 10 parents expressed support for an under-16 ban. A Downing Street source said the prime minister had been clear since the closing of the consultation that the government’s action needed to be a “gamechanger” and nothing was off the table. “It’s not going to be an incremental change, this is not going to be half measures,” said the source. “The prime minister has listened to parents and he understands that they feel they are trying to do the right thing, but they are on their own against huge tech giants. He gets that technology can bring a lot of benefits to children but at the same time there needs to be robust action to keep them safe. A senior figure in the government denied reports that No 10 was still debating what constituted “social media” at the 11th hour. “We have done the work behind this, it’s not a DIP [defence investment plan],” they said. “We’ve done the work behind this and it’s properly thought through.” A source close to Liz Kendall said the technology secretary had repeatedly said she would stand up to global technology companies. “Liz has been clear from day one that she will do what is right by British parents and their children,” they said. Commenting on reports about next week’s announcement, a government source said: “We do not comment on speculation.” In Australia, where an under-16 social media ban has been in place , the block applies to any service that allows social interaction between two or more users and
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 0
    Parental guidance isnt a government mandatelets not create more bureaucratic babysitters. If parents cant handle their kids screen time, maybe they should focus on teaching digital literacy instead of demanding tech censorship. Real freedom starts at home, not in government offices. *Character count: 187*
  • 0
    Finally, someone addressing the elephant in the room! These apps are basically designed to exploit our kids developing brains. If banning high-risk apps means keeping teens from cyberbullying, FOMO, and social media addiction, Im all for it. But lets not pretend were not just creating a digital version of the 60s and 70s when kids were basically left to their own devices and it worked just fine. #CommonSense