UK climate activists fear case delays could cost them right to jury trial

Adem Ay, 45, is facing a trial in July next year. Photograph: Graeme Robertson/The Guardian View image in fullscreen Adem Ay, 45, is facing a trial in July next year. Photograph: Graeme Robertson/The Guardian UK climate activists fear case delays could cost them right to jury trial Defendants worry that changes could remove chance of acquittal based on jurors’ consciences in defiance of the law Climate activists fear that delays to their cases may mean they lose the right to a trial before jurors, who are typically more likely to acquit them than a judge. Scores of defendants facing trials for protests as long ago as 2021 have had proceedings repeatedly postponed and worry that by the time their cases are heard, government changes limiting the right to jury trial may be in force. Juries have an absolute right to acquit based on their conscience. The government has proposed removing the right of defendants accused of so-called either-way offences to elect whether they are tried in a crown court before their peers or in a magistrates court. Among those who fear they could be affected are dozens of people charged under the Public Order Act with “interference with key national infrastructure” in relation to Just Stop Oil slow march protests in 2023. One of these, Adem Ay, 45, from Hackney Wick in east London, who is facing a trial in July next year, said: “I feel like speaking to people [jurors], who can essentially do a smell test of whether this is fair or not, is my only hope because there are so many restrictions happening with how much we can talk about our motivations, how much we can talk about climate change. A number of juries have found protesters innocent when there have been no legal defences available.” The jury trial changes, which will apply retrospectively to cases already in the system, are anticipated to take effect in 2028. Having already had their cases postponed, defendants are concerned there could be further delays that mean the changes affect them. Ay, who is representing himself, said he had argued at Southwark crown court against delay, citing the possible loss of the right to a jury trial. He claimed the judge was sympathetic and said “she was surprised more people weren’t out on the streets protesting”. Dawn Gordon, 22, from Belfast, who is also facing trial in the middle of next year in relation to the slow marches, said: “With a jury trial, it could be that people say actually this was justified because this year we’re going to have heatwaves, it might be the hottest year on record again, and next we’ve got the super El Niño, and if I had my jury trial next year then people would have felt that.” Under the changes, even if magistrates decided that a case should be tried in the crown court, it would be heard without a jury unless the court considered that the defendant was likely to receive a sentence of more than three years on conviction. This could affect Ludi Simpson, 73, from Bradford, who is due to be tried in the s