MI5 to pay damages for surveillance of journalist's phone

Image source, PA Media Image caption, This is believed to be the first time that MI5 has been directed to pay compensation to a journalist By Julian O'Neill Crime and justice correspondent, BBC News NI Published 23 July 2026, 14:30 BST Updated 1 hour ago MI5 and the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) have been ordered to pay £20,000 in damages to a journalist, after they illegally obtained his phone records. Former BBC Journalist Vincent Kearney took a case at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) in London. It is believed to be the first time that MI5 has been directed to pay compensation to a journalist. Kearney was the subject of secret operations aimed at discovering his confidential sources while he worked at the BBC in Belfast. In a statement welcoming the judgement, Kearney said: "I am delighted that the court has penalised those responsible for breaking the law. "The fact it decided to award damages reflects the seriousness of the case. "It is important that agencies charged with upholding the law know that they are not above the law and will be held to account." The BBC, who brought the case alongside Kearney, said: "Today's findings are welcome, necessary and significant. "We hope that their effect will be to protect journalists and their freedom to report and investigate stories into the future." Kearney worked for BBC Northern Ireland for 18 years until 2019, when he joined RTÉ, where he is currently its northern editor. There were multiple operations targeting him between 2006 and 2014, when he was a BBC correspondent covering policing and security issues. Four of them were run by the PSNI, who also created a "profile" on him, which included car registrations and the names of his wife and mother-in-law. He suspects it was for surveillance purposes. 1,580 calls and texts MI5, the PSNI and, on its behalf, the Metropolitan Police, covertly obtained his mobile phone records, enabling them to see numbers in contact with him, and when. Other data they accessed revealed the subscriber names and addresses in respect of the caller numbers. They could also see the locations of where calls were made from. The information did not include the content of those calls or any text messages. The authorisations used were "disproportionate" and broke the law on privacy and the protection of confidential journalistic sources. One operation alone involved trawling through information relating to 1,580 calls or texts he made and received. Kearney first became aware of some unlawful actions in 2024, following an earlier IPT case brought by two other Northern Ireland journalists. But the scale of the "interferences with his journalistic data" only became apparent through legal disclosure at the IPT. The IPT is an independent judicial body which investigates complaints about surveillance by public authorities. In its judgement, the IPT stated: "It is not in dispute that his journalism has made an important contribution to the debate on matters of i