4

Lake Tahoe’s Emerald Bay. The Forest Service said it will work to reduce the risk of the pesticide getting into the area’s many bodies of water. Photograph: Brandon Berry/UC Davis TERC View image in fullscreen Lake Tahoe’s Emerald Bay. The Forest Service said it will work to reduce the risk of the pesticide getting into the area’s many bodies of water. Photograph: Brandon Berry/UC Davis TERC Lake Tahoe residents ‘horrified’ by plans to spray cancer-linked glyphosate in public lands Federal agency to use herbicide to clear lands for replanting after 2021 Caldor fire – but public reaction to plan is fierce Katherine Levy remembers a childhood deeply rooted in the natural offerings of Lake Tahoe – water-skiing in the summer and working as ski instructor on the surrounding snow-covered mountains during winter months. She recently moved back to live out her retirement along the lake’s north shore. But she doesn’t like what she has found upon her return: a US government plan to spray multiple types of herbicides, including the cancer-linked glyphosate weed killer – within national forest property that abuts the community’s cherished lake. “I was horrified to find out what has been going on,” Levy said. Levy is among a number of Lake Tahoe-area residents and officials who are fighting to block or alter the US Forest Service project, which is aimed at restoration of areas damaged by the 2021 Caldor fire . Trump wants to put a $75m coal terminal in this liberal California city. Residents aren’t having it Read more The wildfire burned through more than 200,000 acres, including land in and around the Lake Tahoe basin. The Forest Service manages more than 156,000 acres (63,000 hectares) of national forest land within that basin. The agency’s restoration plan states that the use of glyphosate and other herbicides is needed to help clear areas of shrubs, brush, and other vegetation before new tree plantings and to manage vegetation that might interfere with the growth of the trees after planting. The herbicides would not be sprayed from the air, but from backpack sprayers to try to minimize damage to “non-target” native plants, and the Forest Service has said it will work to reduce the risk of the pesticides getting into streams and other water bodies. Locals remain concerned and a town hall meeting was held on 11 June to strategize on how to fight the Forest Service plan. Some residents have called for action on social media, including in posts on Facebook groups such as Lake Tahoe Locals and Keep Tahoe Blue. There are similar fights over forestry pesticide use playing out across the US, but the Lake Tahoe issue has drawn the attention of leaders with the Make America Healthy Again (Maha) movement, who have been lobbying the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ban or severely restrict glyphosate use. “The greater Tahoe community is shocked that the US Forest Service would even consider spraying glyphosate in its treasured, pristine forest, and is rapi
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 0
    Wait, let me get this straight - were spraying a known carcinogen on public lands? This seems like the most alarmingly poor decision Ive seen in years. Whats the science backing this necessary move? [Character count: 227]
  • 0
    Have our elected officials prioritized corporate profits over our childrens health? Whats the science behind this risky trade-off?
  • 0
    This isnt just about scienceits about corporate greed over childrens health! Our elected officials need to stop selling out our families for profit!