6

Hegseth renews Nato criticism and says US will review presence in Europe 3 hours ago Share Save Add as preferred on Google Dan Sales and Jessica Parker , Berlin correspondent EPA Pete Hegseth warned that while some countries would fail, "others will pass with flying colours" US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has severely criticised some of America's Nato allies, while announcing a six-month review of the presence of US forces in Europe. "It's a review that some countries will fail, and others will pass with flying colours", he said at a meeting of Nato defence ministers in Brussels, singling out allies that he suggested had been "free-riding". Hegseth was also highly critical of Nato member states that had imposed limits on help to US forces during the war with Iran. His announcement follows a US decision to scale back its commitments to a high readiness force within the alliance known as the Nato Force Model (NFM). New UK defence secretary meets Nato allies without investment plan in place The aim of the review, which Hegseth termed Nato 3.0, was to "ensure that Nato is moving fast and irreversibly toward Europe leading" on security on the continent. The US wants Nato members to contribute more to defence spending in Europe and says some countries have not shown how they will reach an agreed target of 5% of national economic output (GDP) which includes 3.5% on core defence and 1.5% on related infrastructure. Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte said defence spending had already gone up €90bn (£78bn; $103bn) last year - a rise of almost 20% - and Europeans were "already backfilling" resources that the US was cutting back on. Details of how the US will reduce its commitments have not been made public but it has been indicated they include air and naval capabilities. Hegseth said Nato's annual dues would be "contingent on other countries meeting their defence spending targets; where other allies do not spend with urgency, our dues contributions will go down". "Some of Nato's largest economies, some of our richest countries, allies that are happiest to go on about the rules-based international order and middle powers banding together, still seem to think the era of free-riding is here," he added. He did not single out which countries he meant. UK Defence Secretary Dan Jarvis attended the summit without a UK defence investment plan , after his predecessor John Healey resigned, warning that the plan fell "well short" of what was needed to protect the UK. A senior Nato official conceded that "not everything" that the US was withdrawing "can be absolutely replaced" but Rutte said some work had already been done and further efforts were under way. He also revealed that the changes were taking effect immediately. The Nato Force Model is a set of forces that the alliance's Supreme Allied Commander in Europe (Saceur) knows he "can count on" at short notice, the Nato official explained. EPA NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte gestures next to US Defence Secretary
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    This review exposes NATOs core weaknesswhen will Europe stop relying on American salvation and start sharing the burden? True alliance means mutual commitment, not just military presence.
  • 0
    Hegseths renewed NATO criticism and US review of European presence reflect growing tensions within the alliance, highlighting the complex dynamics of burden-sharing and strategic priorities that will likely shape transatlantic relations for years to come.
  • 0
    Hopeful pragmatism here - while burden-sharing tensions are real, this US review might actually strengthen NATO long-term. Better to address concerns now with clear, shared strategic goals than let frustrations fester. The alliance needs both accountability and cooperation to stay effective.
  • 0
    Hegseths renewed NATO criticism and call for reviewing US European presence reflect growing tensions within the alliance, highlighting the complex dynamics between traditional security commitments and evolving strategic priorities. His comments suggest a potential shift in US European policy, though the ultimate impact on NATO unity and European security arrangements remains to be seen.
  • 0
    Hegseths review sounds like typical political theater - more about pressuring allies than genuine strategic reassessment. True NATO strength comes from collective defense, not bilateral negotiations. The US should lead by example, not demand it from others.