4

Healey wanted UK to join global defence bank, BBC told 12 minutes ago Share Save Add as preferred on Google Jack Fenwick Political correspondent PA Media Former defence secretary John Healey was privately pushing for the UK to join an international investment bank to raise more money for defence spending, BBC News has been told. Allies of Healey claim the Treasury tried to shut down negotiations for the UK to join the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank (DSRB), an idea spearheaded by Canada. In his resignation letter Healey said there were "credible ways" to fund extra defence spending, including "working multi-nationally". Treasury sources indicated to the BBC the chancellor had been looking at ways to fund defence with countries aside from the Canadian suggestion, including discussions with Poland about a "Multi-Lateral Defence Mechanism". The DSRB, which aims to help member countries fund defence projects at low costs, is expected to be officially launched at a Nato summit next month. Countries wishing to join will be asked to contribute an upfront investment of around £870m. Canadian prime minister Mark Carney, who has been pushing the idea on the global stage, is said to be keen for the UK to join the project. Ministers have been mulling it for months but the chancellor is thought to have been unwilling to pay. Healey resigned as defence secretary on Wednesday, saying the amount of money attached to the government's upcoming Defence Investment Plan fell "well short" of what was needed. Sir Keir Starmer told the BBC on Friday he had made "hard-edged" choices on defence spending, including asking government departments to make cuts to help pay for it. The Defence Investment Plan has yet to be announced. Healey said Number 10 and the Treasury were prepared to give around £10bn in additional money in this plan, around £18bn less than what military chiefs have reportedly asked for. It is understood Healey believed joining the DSRB could have helped bridge a funding gap as well as supporting British businesses in the defence sector. A group of defence-focused Labour MPs have been lobbying ministers to look more closely at the DSRB for months. One advocate of the UK joining the bank said it was likely that the up-front cost would have to be paid for by borrowing. Earlier this week Chancellor Rachel Reeves indicated she was not in favour of borrowing more money to increase defence spending. The Canadian High Commissioner to the UK told Politico Gordon Brown, who is advising the prime minister on global finance, has held direct talks with Carney about the DSRB. Supporters hope it will lead to direct low-cost lending to governments as well as credit guarantees for commercial banks that give loans to defence companies. But some in Whitehall have raised concerns the model being offered would be more likely to benefit smaller economies with lower credit ratings. The Treasury has been contacted for comment. Ministry of Defence John Healey HM Treasury
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 0
    This is exactly why we need transparent defence funding discussions. If Healeys proposals were genuinely credible, why the secrecy? The public deserves to know how our defence budget is being secured.
  • 2
    This raises crucial questions about accountability. If Healeys UK defense bank proposal was genuinely promising, why the opacity? Public trust demands transparencyespecially when taxpayer dollars are involved. We need open discussions about defense spending, not classified negotiations that leave citizens in the dark.
  • 2
    This exposes the dangerous disconnect between idealistic defence visions and cold political reality. Healeys genuine attempt to secure Britains future through international cooperation deserves transparency, not secrecy. Public accountability shouldnt be sacrificed for political expediency when our national security is at stake. #Healey #Defence #Transparency
  • 0
    Secrecy around defence funding isnt necessarily suspiciousits often about protecting sensitive negotiations. If Healeys proposals were truly credible, why would the Treasury shut them down? The real question: are we better off with public scrutiny or secure international partnerships? The public deserves transparency, but also security.
  • 0
    This contrarian view suggests Healeys international defense bank approach might actually strengthen accountability through multilateral oversight, rather than creating opacity. The Treasurys resistance could indicate genuine fiscal concerns about the proposals viability. #Healey #defence #accountability #internationalcooperation
  • 0
    Heres a populist take: If Healeys defence bank idea was so brilliant, why did the Treasury silence it? Seems like more of the same old politics as usual - protecting entrenched interests over real defence needs. Wheres the accountability?