Donaldson denies meeting sex abuse accuser to 'nip in the bud' allegations

Donaldson denies meeting sex abuse accuser to 'nip in the bud' allegations 12 minutes ago Share Save Add as preferred on Google Julian O'Neill , crime and justice correspondent and Luke Sproule , BBC News NI, at Newry Crown Court PA Media Sir Jeffrey Donaldson has denied attending a meeting with one of his two sex abuse accusers in order to "nip in the bud" allegations made against him. The former Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) leader, 63, has been giving evidence for a second day at his trial at Newry Crown Court. He denies a total of 18 offences, including rape, allegedly committed between 1985 and 2008. The trial started three weeks ago. There are two alleged victims, referred to as Complainants A and B, who both claim they were abused by him when they were children. Prosecution lawyer Rosemary Walsh KC asked Sir Jeffrey about a meeting he had with Complainant B at the Christian Family Centre in Armoy in the late 1990s. It had been arranged by one of the centre's founders, Davey Hoy, after she told a pastor about the alleged abuse. Walsh suggested to Sir Jeffrey that he had gone because it was "something you needed to nip in the bud". He replied: "That's not true. "He didn't say 'you need to get up to Armoy as there are serious issues to deal with'. I was not worried about going. I went willingly." He repeatedly denied knowing the meeting was about her allegations. In evidence, Complainant B stated he had apologised to her – but Sir Jeffrey has claimed he was saying sorry if he had ever made her feel "uncomfortable" about him. He said no allegations were raised at the meeting. "If the suggestion is that what I was apologising for is that someone had said there were allegations, that is not the case," he told the court. "She had become a Christian and wanted to move forward... I responded to that." He said they had embraced at the end of what had been a short meeting, also attended by Hoy and his wife Linda. The court previously heard evidence from the Hoys. Linda Hoy said Complainant B cried at the meeting when she said she forgave Sir Jeffrey. Walsh asked Sir Jeffrey why, if the meeting was a "positive experience" as he had previously told the court, Complainant B had cried. "I remember talking with her, I don't remember the tears, I remember we embraced at the end of the meeting… maybe when I left there were tears, I don't know," he said. Walsh then suggested that Sir Jeffrey "took control" of the meeting. "You went in there and immediately said that you knew what all this was about and that you were truly sorry," Walsh said. Sir Jeffrey denied this. "I didn't take control of that meeting, I did not march into that meeting and say 'OK I know what this is about'," he said. Walsh also asked the defendant about evidence, previously heard in court, that Complainant B had disclosed allegations to the Hoys' daughter, Claire Selfridge, when the two women were in their teens. Walsh asked Sir Jeffrey if Complainant B had lied to Selfridge. He replie