0

The executive officer of the Jewish Council of Australia, Sarah Schwartz. Schwartz has made a submission to the royal commission on antisemitism and social cohesion. Photograph: Con Chronis/AAP View image in fullscreen The executive officer of the Jewish Council of Australia, Sarah Schwartz. Schwartz has made a submission to the royal commission on antisemitism and social cohesion. Photograph: Con Chronis/AAP Conflation of Jewish identity with Israel driving antisemitism, Jewish Council says in submission to royal commission Progressive Jewish group calls for more focus on the threat from the far right and the recognition of a diversity of views within the community Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast Far-right extremism and the conflation of Jewish identity with Israel are the main drivers of antisemitism in Australia, the Jewish Council of Australia (JCA) says. In its submission to the royal commission on antisemitism and social cohesion, the liberal Jewish group calls for more focus on the “often overlooked” threat from the far right, and recognition of the diversity of views within the Jewish community instead of the “tendency to treat Jews collectively as representatives of Israel”. In the submission, which the JCA made public this week, executive officer Sarah Schwartz says the “resurgent Australian far-right is a hotbed of antisemitism even as it weaponises Jewish grief to legitimise attacks on migrant communities and religious minorities”. The submission says two important drivers of antisemitism are the “growth of far-right, neo-Nazi and conspiracist movements, which represent a significant and often overlooked threat to Jewish communities, and the aggressive actions of the state of Israel and conflation of Jewish identity with Israel”. That is “a conflation that the state of Israel itself has long cultivated and which causes direct harm to Jewish people worldwide when they are blamed for Israel’s actions”, the submission says. Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email Over the course of the commission’s first block of public hearings in May, the commissioner, Virginia Bell, heard discussions of the blurred lines between antisemitism and legitimate criticism of Israel’s actions , as well as first-hand stories of antisemitic attacks , details of the policing on the day of the Bondi attack and discussions on the definition of antisemitism . The debate over identification with Israel is multifaceted. Other submissions have included statements from Australian Jews strongly identifying with the state, including from Daniel Aghion , the president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, which has been critical of the views of the JCA and regards it as unrepresentative of the majority of Australian Jews. Others have testified before the commission that Australian Jews should not be held responsible for Israel’s actions. Vic Alhadeff, the former chief execut
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.

No comments yet.