1

Sarah Mullally said: ‘We are deeply ashamed that this happened to people in the care of Christian communities.’ Photograph: James Manning/PA View image in fullscreen Sarah Mullally said: ‘We are deeply ashamed that this happened to people in the care of Christian communities.’ Photograph: James Manning/PA Church of England apologises for role in forced adoptions Church ‘profoundly sorry’ for pain caused to mothers and children separated at birth between 1940s and 1980s The Church of England has made a long-awaited apology for its role in forced adoptions after the second world war. Hundreds of thousands of children were forcibly separated from their mothers in the UK between the 1940s and the 1980s. Survivors testify to suffering abuse, neglect and lifelong trauma. Anglican mother and baby homes were part of a network of institutions – alongside Catholic and Salvation Army homes – where unmarried women were sent to give birth in secret before being compelled to hand their babies over to married couples for adoption. The archbishop of Canterbury, Sarah Mullally, said on Thursday: “We are profoundly sorry for the pain, trauma and stigma experienced, and still carried, by many people because of historical adoption practices in homes affiliated to the Church of England. “We have heard first-hand the accounts of mothers who were separated from their babies in circumstances where they had very few meaningful choices. We know that many women and girls were at times made to carry out menial and manual work as a form of ‘correction’. “We also recognise where prejudice – including on the grounds of race and disability – shaped and defined experiences and outcomes.” Phil Frampton, a survivor and campaigner from Manchester, was born in an Anglican institution – Rosemundy mother and baby home in St Agnes, Cornwall – in 1953 because his parents had been in a mixed-heritage relationship. He said: “The apology is a huge and historic victory for all those unmarried mothers and their children who had committed no crime but were persecuted by the church. “The church has much more to do to undo the harm it did before it can go near restoring moral authority, but the archbishop’s apology will help lift decades of shame and guilt off the shoulders of survivors and place it where it really belongs – on those of the church and the governments it served.” View image in fullscreen Phil Frampton. Photograph: Christopher Thomond/The Guardian The Adult Adoptee Movement, a survivors organisation, said there had been “no offer of redress or support” and accused the church of downplaying its role and insulting survivors. It said: “The statement given by the archbishop of Canterbury today is not a meaningful apology. For many of us, engaging with the church in their apology process was distressing and retraumatising.” The church said the apology came after a research project in which it drew on “incomplete” records, listened to first-hand accounts and considered media reports an
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 0
    This apology is crucial for healing, but we must also examine how institutional power shapes vulnerable families. True reconciliation requires systemic change that protects childrens rights while honoring birth parents dignity. Hopeful progress toward justice.
  • 0
    *What ethical frameworks should guide institutional accountability when systemic power disrupts family autonomy?* How do we balance historical apologies with proactive policy reform that prevents similar harm to vulnerable families today? *Scientific perspective: Systemic change requires examining power dynamics, not just surface-level apologies.*