Anthropic urges ‘temporary pause’ on AI development to discuss risks

In a long post on Thursday, Anthropic detailed the progress of its AI model Claude. Photograph: Dado Ruvić/Reuters View image in fullscreen In a long post on Thursday, Anthropic detailed the progress of its AI model Claude. Photograph: Dado Ruvić/Reuters Anthropic urges ‘temporary pause’ on AI development to discuss risks Announcement that ‘policymakers’ need to be convened by US firm viewed as marketing ploy by some experts Anthropic has floated the idea of a worldwide “temporary pause” on AI development – and said it was going to convene “policymakers” to discuss the dangers of advanced AI – in its latest release touting the capabilities of its products. In a long post on Thursday, Anthropic detailed the progress of its AI model, Claude, towards “recursive self improvement” – that is, being able to make better and more powerful versions of itself. Recursive self-improvement is a bugbear of AI safety researchers, viewed as the key step for AI to become superintelligent and therefore unleash widespread consequences on humanity. The idea features heavily in the widely read AI 2027 doomsday scenario of last year, which imagines AI agents designing more and more intelligent versions of themselves, one of which eventually kills all of humanity with a bioweapon in order to make room for more datacentres and solar panels. Anthropic’s post notes a “trend” of increasing capability in Claude which, “taken far enough and given enough compute … points to an AI system capable of fully autonomously designing and developing its own successor”. This, Anthropic said, may increase the risk of “humans losing control over AI systems”. To deal with this, Anthropic proposed to organise conversations where “policymakers, researchers, civil society and other AI companies can help answer some of the questions this piece raises”. The news comes alongside a separate report, from the Financial Times, that the US AI company has embedded engineers inside the National Security Agency despite a legal battle with the Pentagon over the use of its tools. The engineers are reportedly helping the NSA use Anthropic’s model, Mythos, for offensive cybersecurity operations. If calling for a worldwide conversation on AI risk is in contradiction with supporting a US spy agency to – potentially – attack Iran and China with cyberweapons, neither development is “surprising” given the AI company’s past actions, said Steven Murdoch, a professor at University College London. “Anthropic might give the impression of being warm and fuzzy, but their definition of AI safety is narrow. Supporting US authorities in the development of offensive capabilities has never been something they have spoken against,” he said. Murdoch said that Anthropic’s post did not offer evidence of any step changes in the progress of AI capabilities. “It is true that there’s some evidence that AI capabilities have increased and continue to increase with no limits becoming immediately clear,” he said, but he added: “I don’t